Or, to bring it back to publishing, when a book designer presents possible book covers, they don’t just do one cover with minor variations (do you want red or black type should the typeface be 12pt or 16pt). You would look at many houses, over an extended period of time. (I am not talking about multi-tasking here, where you try to do 10 things at the same time rather, you have multiple tracks ongoing, which gives you choices.)įor example, if you want to buy a house, you don’t just look at one house and make an offer. Why do psychologists who study decision-making agree that this is good advice? Because multiple options create a real choice. You’ve heard it suggested before: write ten openings to your story. Multiple answers: Add action, revise for mood, create a totally new scene, keep the action the same but change the setting, keep the setting but change the action, create a different emotional context, and so on. Recognize: The final chapter/scene isn’t working–yet.Īsk: What options do I have to improve the storytelling here? ![]() One trick to make sure you are asking more open-ended questions is to remove the current option that forces you to take a wider look at your story and its context.Īsk: What if there was no archer, no arrow? What if Michelle never walked into that dark woods where the archer was hiding? What scene could replace this one? That’s giving yourself some real options that can lead to decisions that create a stronger revision. Instead, ask, “How will the character’s hair color influence the story? What if she were blond? Brunette? Red? Black? White?” You don’t just want to know the effect in a small section of the story, but across the whole novel. Narrowly framed questions like this look at the revision in isolated chunks and that’s not helpful. You wonder whether or not your character should be red-headed. Editors don’t care HOW you make the story work, only that you do something that works. You don’t have to answer a “whether or not” question. When you are presented with only two options, don’t accept that narrow framing of the revision question. But what if you revise it, concentrating on the mood the scene evokes, working to make it tense and emotion-filled? Maybe the problem is Mood, not amount of Action present. Or, you may get a revision note that says the final chapter/climax scene doesn’t have enough excitement and needs more action. What if, she is shot in the leg and can’t walk or, she is shot in the eye and can’t see or, she is shot and runs a fever and recovers or, she avoids the arrow, but Jillian is shot instead or, (fill in the blank)_. That’s too narrow a context for a revision decision, and leaves out many alternate options. This frames the revision in terms of whether or not Michelle will be shot with an arrow and then die. You get a letter from an editor that says something like this: “When Michelle is shot with an arrow, I wonder if she really needs to die. All rights reserved.The process of revising your novel or story is a series of decisions and understanding the decision process can strengthen your revision process. ![]() ![]() ![]() The role preference measure itself must be considered when interpreting patient responses to a measure or question about a patient's preference for decision roles.Ĭopyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. Measures themselves, in addition to patient population, influenced the preferred decision roles reported.įindings appear to vary with the measure of preferred decision making used, time of the publication and characteristics of the population. The majority of respondents preferred sharing decision roles in 71% of the studies from 2000 and later, compared to 50% of studies before 2000. The majority of patients preferred sharing decisions with physicians in 63% of the studies. Studies were compared by patient population, time of publication, and measure.ġ15 studies were eligible. Eligible studies measured patient decision role preferences, described measures, presented findings as percentages or mean scores and were published in English from any country. Empirical literature on patient decision role preferences regarding treatment and screening was reviewed to summarize patients' role preferences across measures, time and patient population.įive databases were searched from January 1980 to December 2007 (1980-2007 Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PsychInfo, Web of Science and PubMed (2005-2007)).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |